无尽

关于结局主角是否出了循环圈 大佬们都各种分析为何出来 或者 为何没出来 我就简单说一下 最后逃如果出来了 为何不直接以一段在高速公路上扬长而去的远景结束 或者其他的拍摄手法 至少没必要误导观众对于结局的解读 可以看出这至少不是一个开放性的结局 就像盗梦空间最后的陀螺 它倒了！

导演给出了特写 必定有其含义 并不是随你怎么理解的意思 本片最后一段关于汽油的对白 加上远处飞来的群鸟特写 怎么看都是为了告诉我们 他们还在循环圈里面 并没有出圈 7.8分 挺好看

洛夫克拉夫特说过“人类最古老的最强烈的感情是恐惧，而最古老最强烈的恐惧是对未知的恐惧”电影浓重的克苏鲁风格是我喜欢的，以图像的方式呈现“神秘”的第一视角，细思极恐，再加上剧情烧脑，电影理所应当的拿高分。

简单的说说我对剧情的理解，每个人的循环空间大小都不同，兄弟两人的循环空间是最大的，超出了营地范围，我认为哥俩的循环是从公路上第一根石柱开始，去营地的路上当哥哥发现左右两边的公路一模一样就知道不对劲了，知道车子没油也能继续开，所以坚决不给弟弟开车。

每个人记忆刷新节点也不同，所以哥哥记得小时候这里的不好，弟弟却只记得小时候的好，再加上暴怒男和瘾君子还有瘾君子兄弟的对话，说明就算是自杀，记忆也不一定刷新。

最后兄弟两自己也明白也没有逃出循环，因为进去的时候电线杆在车子的左边，出来的时候还是在车子左边，这说明他们一直在向一个方向开，弟弟看到车子没油也能开的时候哥哥说出了“你全都明白了”。

电影里有几段对话挺引人深思的：弟弟曰：①“其实你想一想，被困在这样的循环之中，与回到家后，无止境的循环一天又一天糟糕透顶的日子，直至死亡，其实并没有太大区别”。

②“死亡只是一瞬间，糟糕的人生却是又臭又长”。

③“任何事情都比你给我创造的人生有意义”。

哥哥曰：“回到家后，至少一切都是充满希望的”弟弟负能量满满，他处境正是现在社会的某一部分人，比如社畜和底层劳动者不正是这样的吗，日复一日年复一年，暗无天日的循环做着同一件事，厌恶压抑的生活，却又无力去改变。

被父母安排好的人生不也是这样吗，用着他们那个年代的对策来对儿女实行，过着父母认为好的生活，像个木偶一样，不从就是不孝，从了委屈自己。

哥哥却是一碗心灵鸡汤，再压抑无聊无趣的生活，也有曙光和希望，可能是漫长阴雨过后的太阳，可能是秋日大街纷飞的落叶，与其为生活的不满伤透神，不如想想如何让自己的生活更精彩。

1 烧脑电影，片名点明主题2 节奏太慢，会让观众失去耐心3 很多地方莫名其妙没有解释清楚，让人看得云里雾里4 这部电影得至少看两遍很多地方才能弄明白5 其实人生也是电影里的无尽循环的一种6 每个人都活在循环中7 不知道电影里的神秘怪物到底是什么8 剧情上的漏洞实在太多都数不过来

反复看了好几遍后..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................发现每个人看到最后，都会问：那他们到底逃出循环没？

有人觉得出来了，有人觉得没有，然而根据《digitalspy》上含蓄的剧透：“one theory holds that the brothers are unknowingly trapped in a larger loop of their own（两兄弟不知不觉地进入了他们自己的一个大循环中了）” 。

看两兄弟刚出来时的远景。

注意那座山的山口：

之后9秒又给了反光镜里的一个镜头：

不用画圈圈都能看清楚了8？！

恐怖8？！

令人绝望8？！

其实，他们献给妈妈的那张画已经说明结局。

为什么这么多年过去了，当年孩童献给妈妈的那张画还是象新的一样？

应为这个车祸的事发现场周边已经被圈定为一个循环圈了，在这个循环圈里，时间早已被设定静止了。

还有更令人绝望的：1小时31分37秒

看到那重叠往复的镜头没？

首相导演想说的意思大家都已明了，就是人类总是在不停地重复自己错误，没完没了，有时还是故意地不走出循环：营地那群人在寻找的是永恒的平静，这群人其实来自全然不同的年代，叼着烟斗的貌似最古老，画画的女孩是在两兄弟之后才进去的，所以还不到10年，变魔术的仁兄觉得自己活了115年了....但他们全都是自觉自愿甘之如饴。

尤其是数学家，因为解不开一道难题，所以祈祷天地永恒时间静止，可以让他左后通关....至今未果。

而其他圈子里的一些则是心不甘情不愿的，比如帐篷里那十分十分十分古老（可能是南北战争时期的遗老）的愤怒的小鸟。

各圈循环时间的长短也各有不同，帐篷里的好像只有一分钟，帮助朋友解毒的迈克他们就有好几个礼拜，迈克那个爱贴纸条的老婆珍妮的循环应该很短，而兄弟两的时间.....应该是从首次离开营地10年以后开始算的。

神棍帮的时间很是含糊，首先他们自己以月亮的数量计算，看他们把兄弟俩从小孩子拉扯到成年这一点看，感觉他们的时间好像应该超过十年才对。

恐怖的事情是，这些人岁在地理位置上相距很近，但却永远碰不上，比如画画妹子曾和吸毒老有过一段。

但自从进了圈后就在没见面了，而贴条嫂嫂的老公迈克更是咫尺天涯地和她生活在同一山谷里，却无法改变珍妮永远的悲伤寡妇的处境。

行走男想要戒毒男的枪，但如果没有外人帮忙，自己就永远都拿不到。

其实两兄弟自己早就有了自己走不出的循环。

阿龙告状心理医生说贾斯丁总是要做决定，每次总是错的，所以把人生弄到如此糟糕。

那是不是这次决定要走出神棍帮的决定也依然错误巨大呢？

艾伦·穆尔黑德自己给Digital Spy的剧透是：“ But ultimately, we just want to make sure that by the end of the film, you feel like their interpersonal conflict has gone through a change. Because their interpersonal conflict was its own loop, in a weird little way. They kept on making the same mistakes with each other, and Aaron kept on submitting to Justin's will, and Justin kept on closing it. ”。

就是说，虽然老二最终冲自己唯一的家人说了本不愿说的实话，那什么”你的决定从来糟糕“”从没对过“....什么的，但他最终也还是遵循了老哥的错误决定。

他天生就是这样懦弱的个性，必须有个强有力的老大依靠和指引，这也是那东西对他一直是利诱（好吃的啦，大家庭啦，女色啦，还有大麻）而对容易质疑权威的老大就常常加以恐吓（野兽，湖怪，地动山摇，神秘力量代发塔罗牌什么的）。

无论如何，就算在大社会里，”那东西“的力量也依然存在，不然老二又怎会收到那个阻止他去加油的邮包？

这些铺垫让我不禁担心，如果两兄弟最终冲进了自己的循环圈，且是被困在那条无止尽的公路上没完没了地开车那么惨？！

是不是早早从了阿龙要留在营地的意愿还好一点呢？

很多人说这是部烧脑剧而非恐怖片，但我觉得这就是本片革新的境界——烧脑恐怖！

你会想再回头去看一遍不会怕，越看你觉得越明白，而越明白没你才越觉得恐怖。

最恐怖的还是你最后的问题，虽然有证据显示这两兄弟没走出循环，但也依然有迹象显示，如这些被困人好像都是第一次重见两兄弟，两兄弟可以行走于不同的循环就好像应该代表了他们现在还不在里面......等等。

那么这两兄弟到底走出来没？

本片一开头就已致敬美国伟大的H.P. 洛夫克拉夫特了：

连斯蒂芬金都尊其为” 20世纪最伟大的古典恐怖故事作家 “。

这次，贾斯丁本森和艾伦穆尔黑得就决定把这未知玩到比斯蒂芬金的《小丑》都要狠的地步：长什么样：未知；是什么：未知；连什么时候：最后还来个无限循环的不循环的循环，让观众——就说我吧，狠狠烧过好几次脑才惊栗地反应过来..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................天哪！

我也跟着循环了!

又一部细思极恐的悬疑电影，电影思路想法很棒，在这个循环世界里，不同的人有着不同的权限，而主角应该是什么权限最大的，电影中，循环区域越小，循环时间越短，那么主角兄弟俩是不是拥有着大于所有人的活动区域已经循环时间呢？

至于说主角并没有循环记忆，那为什么这不能是主角的第一次循环开启呢？

从十年前逃出小镇开始，到十年后再次逃出小镇终止，又或者是到更久的未来终止，小镇外就一定不是循环区域吗？

也许只是边界更大，没有走到路标处而已。

看到很多认真的豆友贴上了导演访谈，我认为哈，一般聪明的导演对那些娱乐周刊或者电影记者都有些降次元的优越感，尤其是那种自己写烧脑电影剧本又自己拍的。

有时候导演觉得问题记者个人引导性太强，或者问题不够对他胃口（比如，问题的本身就表现出对这个电影不太理解）导演是完全不介意随口乱说两句的。

这和很多成功艺术家一样，他们有时候就是会在他们认为没懂还要去报道的记着面前故意乱说几句。

毕竟，电影本身才是导演试图和观众交流的本身，任何诠释都不如电影本身。

换作艺术也是一样。

所有的争论都集中在兄弟俩有没有逃出轮回以及为何每批人的轮回都有自己的圈和时间线。

我的理解是，本来轮回是在一个圈里的，时间也比较长，差不多十一二年左右（一个小男孩长大成人）。

但有些识破轮回本质的人，为了对抗轮回的无意义以及无自主性，他们选择自杀而不是根据“神”设定的轮回节奏。

一旦在一个轮回里自杀，轮回会缩短成为：知道轮回怎么回事-自杀这样一个小轮回。

因此那个上吊男，本来和营地的其他人一样，轮回时间是十一二年左右（他记得小男孩来的时候的事），但因为他几次自杀行为，他的轮回越来越短 ，有了枪之后就更短了。

那些无法交流的轮回小圈子，都是离开了集体，自己寻找解决方案的，他们无法与其他人再次见面的原因是他们的轮回时间变短了。

所以从这个逻辑来说，离开轮回大圈子的兄弟俩，最后撞向轮回的边缘，获得了极短的轮回时间，确实就是那开车的几秒。

但是在这个极短轮回里，兄弟都得到了他们想要的东西，弟弟得到了哥哥的信任，解开了哥哥对他生活的控制；哥哥得到了弟弟的原谅和信任。

这是他们原来没有的，原来的生活穷困潦倒，互相依赖的两个人矛盾不断。

所以长也不一定好啊

人类最古老、最强烈的感情是恐惧，而最古老、最强烈的恐惧，是对未知的恐惧。

不愧是哥俩的自编自导自演，剧情的展开和推进，非常的顺畅，剪辑手法到位，饱满的剧情与角色，哥俩的表现也很不错。

这让我想起了逃出绝命镇和仲夏夜惊魂，习以为常的日常中的异常，在平缓的和谐氛围中又透露着一丝丝的诡谲，在一丝丝的深入骨髓，一丝丝的勾引着你。

而主角那种带有克制的质疑与不适感，真的很符合这凝滞的气氛，细细琐琐的线索，引导着剧情前进，擦拭着层层的迷雾。

渐渐地，异常，变得愈多愈明显，迷者愈迷，疑者愈疑。

迷雾中的端倪，朦朦胧胧，但是，没有那种矫情的故弄玄虚。

吻合克苏鲁的一切，迷雾一样，梦幻一般，高维不可具象化，这就是克苏鲁，用抽象的罗夏墨迹来形容克苏鲁，怪贴切的，相比星之彩，这部更加深沉含蓄与耐人寻味。

最后也终于理解了，没有所谓邪教，没有对错与恶意，只是在无尽的轮回中的，失去意义的无趣，眼底的深哀与苦中作乐，以及仍不忘给你的善良与忠告。

饱含哲理的话语，那一幕相隔的轻轻一挥，伫立火中不屈的身影，其中味道万千。

而果然，与开头相呼应，朋友之间会相对频繁的向彼此倾诉自己的感情，而兄弟姐妹则会等待一个更为方便的时机，比如临终之前。

兄弟俩再次定义了彼此，逃出生天，伴随着成员们眼中的期盼与安静的转身，而转身后，面对成员们的又是无尽的轮回。

现实中的你，面对虚幻时，你会怎样选择呢，瞬间与漫长，你会怎样选择呢，这样不可逆的选择，会心动吗，会后悔吗。

该作对于时空以及克苏鲁的描绘，伴以演员们出彩的表现，相当生动令人印象深刻，这无尽时空轮回，对比着现实中历史的不可逆，发人深思，这直到死亡的日复一日，也是重复的轮回吗，你也在苦中作乐吗，你充满希望还是无奈呢，抗争还是屈服呢，我们的生活中，存在深渊吗，深渊是什么呢，我们深陷其中无法挣脱吗，也许，答案就像那未解的方程式吧，哈哈哈。

深渊，一直在凝视着你

看完之后的一点脑洞谁也不要太高兴，没人能逃离loop，不过是有的人的loop 短，有的人的loop长。

撞墙男的loop是10秒，暴躁男的loop是三个小时，自焚好友二人的loop更长一点，仅此而已。

主流观点说主角兄弟俩的loop是10年，但是我觉得会更长。

他们出去之后会死亡，然后回到小时候出车祸的时间点。

然后继续这10+年的loop。

但是其实我想说的是，可能我们也在loop中。

每天早起上班/上学，就是1天的loop；周末放松、休闲，就是一周的loop；元旦春节元宵五一端午中秋十一元旦，就是一年的loop；小孩子的loop会更长一点，因为小孩子比较容易接受新鲜事物，等他们长大之后就会进入loop。

最终的结果就是我们loop一辈子。

谁也跑不了。

影片开始不久8分07秒，弟弟躺在草坪上仰望的“天空”，兄弟俩一直以来所谓的现实都在“神” 的范围中···但是与其把这个帽子扣给克苏鲁，不如扣给外星人···除此之外我还有两个疑问，1.为啥没有人想过要把结界的棍子拔出来（他们的思想被控制了？

），但是假如能拔掉棍子，是不是就能打破结界？

2.有一段对兄弟两人的采访，画外的声音是个女性，她是谁？

她是不是一直在收集这些信息？

为什么要刻意给这样一段采访？

有可能是下一部的伏笔吧。

没时间读完的朋友，简单总结就是导演说了，结尾是happy ending，不是loop，兄弟俩逃出生天。

http://collider.com/the-endless-explained-interview/‘The Endless’ Filmmakers on Their Trippy Mythology & Deciphering That EndingThis week, Justin Benson and Aaron Moorhead‘s The Endless rolls out on Blu-ray and digital, which means that folks nationwide are going to be unravelling the headtrip horrors of the film’s unnerving, mysterious Lovecraftian mythology and looking for some answers.Earlier this month, I published the first part of my conversationwith the filmmaking duo, which spanned from the duo’s early ideas for expanding the universe they built in their first film, Resolution, to the experience of taking the finished versionThe Endless around the world. And now that the movie has hit more theaters, it seems like a good time to serve up the spoilery portion of the interview, which dives into what to make of the film’s mysterious mythology and ending.If you need a refresher, The Endless follows Benson and Moorhead as Justin and Aaron (yes, they’re using their real names, but no, they’re no playing themselves), a pair of bickering brothers always at odds who return to the UFO death cult they escaped as kids in search of answers. Except when they get there, they don’t find a UFO death cult at all, but a happy and healthy, if admittedly weird and unsettling, commune of people living life on their own terms. They also find something more sinister lurking in the hillsides of the remote camp — an unseen, oppressive presence that communicates through voyeuristic photographs and video clips, trapping people in time-loop prisons where it manipulates and torments them into various horrific fates for its own amusement. A frontiersman trapped in a loop of mere seconds, a man who has to kill himself every few minutes to prevent a worse fate, and the local cult, who have it relatively easy by comparison — living out a decently long three-moon loop that ends with their “ascension,” aka being shredded into bloody bits. Yikes. At least they don’t have to worry about aging.

Image via Well Go USAAnd of course, there’s the return of Mike (Peter Ciella) and Chris (Vinny Curran) from Resolution,who are trapped in the bitter week-long loop of forced sobriety and failing friendship detailed in the 2002 film. The unseen evil in The Endless is the same chilling cosmic threat we met in Resolution, and the films share more crossovers thanyou’d probably imagine on a first watch, so you’re looking for more answers on The Endless, a rewatch of Resolution is the perfect place to start. Or first watch if you caught The Endless first, which works just as well.However, if you’re looking for an easy play-by-play explanation of what goes down in the film, you’re not going to get it from Benson and Moorhead, who insist everything you need to solve the puzzles of their unconventional cinematic universe can be found right there on screen. However, the duo was more than happy to dive into the ideation behind the film’s mythology and the mindset behind ending it the way they did, so check out the interview below for a discussion of the different ways their “monster” is revealed through the characters and settings in the film, the ideas that helped inspire the unseen menace, and why the ending is more about character payoff than answering specific questions.I know you guys have said you have this whole mythology totally down from top to tail. Was that something that you had already achieved at the time ofResolutionor did that come later?JUSTIN BENSON: It’s definitely expanded.AARON MOORHEAD: The rules didn’t change.BENSON: But like withResolutionthere were … In both of these movies, there have been massive documents of things that people never see. And it’s really cool because we’re pretty sure people feel these things in the movie. The things that are into that. But like in the case ofResolution, for example. The unseen antagonist ofResolution, which is the same unseen antagonist inThe Endless, obviously. Except inResolution, the point of view of the whole film is from the unseen antagonist. There was like a massive document that went into everything about that “monster” that went to our sound designer to help them design the sound of the whole film. So that existed duringResolutionand there are things in that document that ended up more conspicuous inThe Endlessthan expanded upon. That’s just like one example of one thing.When it comes to how nailed down the mythology is… Whenthe camera pulls back on that canyon and you see all those bubbles, the time prisons, would you be able to look at that shot and say exactly what’s happening in each one of them?

Image via Well Go USAMOORHEAD: I can tell you how long those loops are, when they reset, and all of that. That exact area, we know it pretty well. And that’s desert, so there’s a whole bunch of poor animals. It’s probably something like that, but I wouldn’t say that we have an entire map of the world and who’s in it. But it wouldn’t be hard to theorize. We definitely have enough. So it would be pretty easy to take a good gander. And then, the little sequence that — the music trimmings for the montage that follows Justin and Aaron walking past the big totem and it’s in the sort of monolith carved monster looking thing.BENSON: The rusty dragon sculpture.MOORHEAD: And the rusty dragon sculpture. So those would all be individual loops that have developed their own sub-cultures and have their own interpretation of what this unseen antagonist is. Depending on how they saw it, the state of mind they’re in, and their own personalities, and all of that. And that these things they’ve created are artistic representations of how they see the antagonist. Whether they’re going specifically through the loop you see in the distance, because they do walk off, that we don’t know. And luckily, we only shot in 4K so you can’t really punch in. [Laughs]BENSON: And what’s funny is … it’s weird how important that sequence was to us because in the movie we basically, the oldest loop that you ever see is what, 1800 something? Some kind of frontiersman like in a tent, but we have a non-existent Easter Island type subculture that developed its own kind of mythology around it. Clearly. And of course, Native Americans with the totem pole. But even the monolith to us — which is kind of the big image of the film anyways — to us. it’s supposed to scare the hell out of you when you realize that’s what that is. When you realize that, that’s the antagonist of the film as seen by people that are so ancient they’re gone in America.In a similar vein, along with those monoliths I loved the ways we see this presence interpreted through the eyes of the characters in the film, like Lizzie’s art and Hal’s equation. What was your process of creating all these different understandings of this one being?MOORHEAD: I mean, that’s something that did start with Resolution but it’s so small. It’s so small. It’s like literally there’s a journal running during the credits sequence of Resolution. It’s a bunch of monster sketches, and that would have been what the French researchers in Resolution were seeing it as. So that goes way back. I don’t even remember anymore what the inspiration for that was. Besides the fact that, unless you can get Giger, the guy who did Alien, unless you have a designer on that level to build a monster … We’re just trying to figure out ways that we can present it visually when we need to at least hint at something and not just show nothing, always. And in this case, we get to show it through sketches, and through sculptures, and things like that.

Image via Well Go USAIn the case of Spring, we showed a monster because the premise alluded to nature as being our designer. And since we don’t have our own Giger, we come up with these, hopefully interesting, clever ways to show an otherworldly being or “monster” and it won’t be really uneventful.I mean if you wanted to pour a glass of wine, on a dark night and think about it. There’s this idea of every civilization has developed an idea of a deity and a God. And their interpretation of it has trickled down into our religions today. Or died out. But in the same way, their visualizations of it have looked so wildly different. And a lot of the time there’s the idea that … There’s two ideas. One is, what if it’s the same thing? What if they’re all the same thing? Of course, unified religion theory, which is kind of an idea that we play with. But we’re merging it with the idea of, what if wasn’t God? What if it was just a monster? Or what if people with porphyria were seen as vampires? You know, that kind of an idea where it’s like, “Oh, there’s nothing metaphysical about it.” Obviously, our movie’s metaphysical. But what if it was a natural phenomenon that people just tried to interpret as a god. And that’s a lot of what we’re talking about with this; they saw it as God and it’s actually just this thing.BENSON: And as you saying that, I just remembered where it comes from. It comes from … This is a deep cut. There’s a guy named John Keel, who’s the guy who wrote The Mothman Prophecies. The book is very different from the movie. It’s not a fictional narrative. It’s sort of a journalist’s account of what happened in an area over a period of time. He wrote a whole collection of other books. The one that I’ve read is Our Haunted Planet and what it’s basically about is this concept of ultra-terrestrials.I’m not saying it is an ultra-terrestrial in this movie, but the idea is that throughout human history whenever human beings saw something and interpreted it as being like, “Oh, I saw something. That was an angel from the bible.” Or, “That was a demon.” Or, “That was an extraterrestrial being.” “That was the Men in Black.” “That was the Mothman.” Whatever. That it’s actually always the same thing. In his case, he was arguing that it was this thing called an ultraterrestrial. That just basically, something that had been here among us, always manipulating the situation and everyone just seeing it differently depending on their culture. So it’s vaguely where the idea comes from. If you could imagine, there are so many species that we haven’t yet cataloged in the Amazon. Things like that. Imagine if there’s like an enormous blind spot that we just completely missed; one really big thing. Again, that’s not what’s in The Endless but it’s that idea.

I do have one very specific question. Are we meant to interpret at the end where we see the image of two cars coming into a collision, that it has anything to do with the car crash that put them there in the first place?MOORHEAD: No.That’s an interesting one where we realized that was an unintentional thing. About 10% percent of people, they’ll kind of have that question of like, “Do they?”When I watch Resolution andThe Endless back to back, something I had not picked up the first time was, they seem almost opposite ending moments. Resolution ends on a feeling of helplessness and being trapped and The Endless is all about breaking free. Was that intentionally designed for those two endings to be on opposite ends of the emotional spectrum?MOORHEAD: Oh, that’s funny. I’m going to give you a yes and no. I think afterSpring, we got addicted to optimistic endings. I think we realized that we are just optimistic people and saying like, “You’re fucked no matter what” is just not our feeling about the way that life is, or at least the message that we want to put out into the world. And also, frankly, it more comes down to the construct of The Endless where, if you’re talking in really broad terms about the movie. If you’re talking about the fact that it says, “Break out of your cycle or be doomed to repeat history forever.” It seems like we should be showing what it looks like to break out of your cycle. And like, “Does that help you?” I don’t think it’s a moral as much as it’s an exploration of it. Because there are people that do enjoy it inside their cycle. I mean, the cult at the end. And you don’t even feel bad for them. A little bit, but it’s more melancholy. It’s like, “Oh. They kind of enjoy it there.” But I think that it would have been untruthful for ourselves if we’d ended it as dark as Resolution had ended.BENSON: Yeah. It just seemed like we know, yes there is a very literal answer to the movie. And the answers in the film…It may take a few viewings, but everything’s very literal and all the evidence, if you want to call it that, is there. In terms of, where’s the movie ending in the sense of the supernatural, and otherworldly, and the sci-fi aspects, and all that.But the thing that’s definite, that’s there, that was the most important to us, was just that you’d see that there was a transformation in the interpersonal relationship between these two brothers. And that you’d see that transformation in just a really understated gesture. And that the emotional satisfaction should come from that. I think anything else beyond that, we do things stylistically to kind of like poke the mystery part of people’s brains a little bit. One example is that it’s a hard cut going out. Things like that where just like you sit there and you go, “Oh, wait. There’s another piece of the puzzle to figure out.” To think about longer. It’s things like that. But there’s definitely one answer to the sci-fi part of it.MOORHEAD: Actually going back to your questions, I just remembered when you said, “People who have viewed the movie multiple times.” There’s something that’s an interesting thing we’ve realizes. Our movies kind of exist in what people have called a Lynchian sort of universe where just things are a little off and all of that. I hadn’t seen almost any Lynch when that comparison started, but what’s interesting is, all of the answers to the movie are, I promise you, they’re in the movie. They are there. It’s not a dream logic situation. We’re not being deliberately obtuse. We just want to tell a mystery that’s got a lot of depth to it. And we just don’t want to lay it all out on the table but they’re in there. If you think about it long enough and hard enough. And you know, you might have to take a couple of, not leaps of logic but leaps of faith that like, “Okay. That is what they meant.” Something like that. But our movies are meant to be, I guess literal. That might be the word for it. They are meant to be telling a full story.